How are you managing the risk of AI transcription bots like otter.ai and fireflies.ai?

1.9k views1 Upvote2 Comments
Sort By:
Oldest
CIO in Energy and Utilitiesa year ago
I use Otter.ai and familiar with its limited capabilities. To start with, the voice recording capability of the app is more risky than its transcription capability. This is because the transcript for non-native English speakers are still primitive and even with iteration of usage it has lots of transcripts mistakes. I’ve seen good integrations between Otter and MS Teams. The fact that the audio recording of the meeting is stored in the cloud is questionable. The risk is if such files are leaked. However, like any other SaaS application this risk can be mitigated by not placing confidential meetings in Otter or create a setting for immediate removal of the transcript once the file is downloaded or shared.
lock icon

Please join or sign in to view more content.

By joining the Peer Community, you'll get:

  • Peer Discussions and Polls
  • One-Minute Insights
  • Connect with like-minded individuals
Managing Partner in Miscellaneousa year ago
You can write policies, you can enforce policies, but you can not fundamentally defy gravity. AI assistance of all forms is the future. Embrace to the maximum extent possible because your competition definitely will.
1

Content you might like

TCO19%

Pricing26%

Integrations21%

Alignment with Cloud Provider7%

Security10%

Alignment with Existing IT Skills4%

Product / Feature Set7%

Vendor Relationship / Reputation

Other (comment)

View Results
5.7k views3 Upvotes1 Comment
196 views

Human Factors (fears, mental health, physical spacing)85%

Technical / IT Factors (on-premise tools, pivoting back away from remote)14%

3.7k views3 Upvotes2 Comments