What emerging trends or developments in legal operations do you find noteworthy or impactful?

1.5k views2 Upvotes3 Comments
Sort By:
Oldest
Legal Manager9 months ago
I'm sure many will echo the sentiment, but integrating AI into the legal landscape is genuinely fascinating. We're in the process of overhauling our outside counsel billing guidelines. Initially, I inserted language expressing acceptance of AI usage but with a requirement to confirm authenticity and correctness. Our General Counsel proposed a more progressive stance, encouraging AI use as a cost-saving measure but still ensuring quality work that is accurate.

So, I'm navigating the challenge of incorporating AI in a beneficial and cost-efficient manner without crossing into areas where caution is warranted. It's a delicate balance, especially considering recent incidents like the individual in New York who crafted briefs using ChatGPT with inaccurate results.

AI in legal research isn't entirely new—resources like Westlaw and LexisNexis have incorporated AI in various forms for years. Still, the trend is evolving, and discussions around its application are gaining momentum. Privacy is another significant area, though it's not a novel trend. Privacy discussions and regulations have been ongoing for years, and many are still actively engaged in this realm.
3 1 Reply
Director of Operations and General Counsel in Manufacturing8 months ago

Fully agree, and I love that you're proactively incorporating AI-based guidance into your policies already.  I also agree that resources like Westlaw and LexisNexis have had elements of "AI" embedded within their systems for awhile now, but I can't wait for them to take full advantage of the growing power of LLMs.  I want to spend more time lawyering, not being a hyper-technical legal search librarian, manipulating nouns and conjunctions to find the right legal resources through antiquated search bars.  LLMs will, I hope, aid lawyers in reducing the amount of time we spend on non-value-added work so that we can dedicate more time to adding more value for clients.

I'm not sure which state you're in, but the California State Bar recently released "Practical Guidance for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law."  It's worth the quick read, and touches on the notion that AI can be used as a cost-saving tool, but that lawyers should bill for the actual time spent on the matter, not for the amount of time saved.  I think this is a healthy approach:  Save time, but that should lower my bill, and I want to know which parts are generated by AI and whether or not a human lawyer reviewed and approved the final result.

More here:  https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/ethics/Generative-AI-Practical-Guidance.pdf

1
lock icon

Please join or sign in to view more content.

By joining the Peer Community, you'll get:

  • Peer Discussions and Polls
  • One-Minute Insights
  • Connect with like-minded individuals
AI LegalTech Counsel & Legal Ops Innovation Leader | Digital Transformation Expert | Strategic Advisor in Services (non-Government)8 months ago
- increased workflow automation
- predictive analytics and data-driven decision-making
- incorporating generative AI and refining use cases
- emphasizing legal tech for efficiency and innovation
- shift towards client-centric services (including AFAs) and value-based billing
3

Content you might like

Open AI (Game Changer: adoption w/ChatGPT)41%

Google (Game Changer: inventor of Transformers, Bard)19%

Microsoft (Game Changer: real time BingGPT+Search plus enterprise enablement)19%

Meta (Game Changer: LLM that can run on single GPU)6%

Amazon (Game Changer: TBD)4%

X.AI / Elon Musk (Game Changer: TBD)3%

Baidu (Chinese tech giant, with GPT version released in March)2%

Someone completely new6%

View Results
46.7k views49 Upvotes15 Comments

Extremely11%

Moderately70%

Slightly19%

Not at all

View Results
227 views