In the year since Chat GPT has launched, has it been a game changer for your workflows, or has it been overhyped?

Game changer74%

Overhyped26%

336 PARTICIPANTS

10.7k views4 Upvotes5 Comments

Sort By:

Oldest

Fellow at CodeX, The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics & Generative AI Editor at law.MIT9 months ago

In the legal field, ChatGPT has indeed been a game changer since its launch. Legal professionals are using it to draft contracts, legal documents, and briefs more efficiently than ever before. The natural language capabilities of ChatGPT make it easier to translate complex legal jargon into plain language, improving communication between lawyers and clients.

Moreover, ChatGPT's ability to quickly research and provide relevant case law and legal precedents has become a valuable asset for legal research. It helps lawyers save time and ensures that their arguments are well-informed and up-to-date.

In compliance and regulatory affairs, ChatGPT has been used to analyze and interpret complex regulations, making it easier for organizations to stay compliant with ever-changing laws. Its assistance in reviewing and summarizing lengthy legal documents has sped up due diligence processes and made mergers and acquisitions more efficient.

IT Manager in Construction9 months ago

The launch of ChatGPT and general availability to the end users it was like a bolt from the blue :)

AI LegalTech Counsel & Legal Ops Innovation Leader | Digital Transformation Expert | Strategic Advisor in Services (non-Government)9 months ago

ChatGPT has been a game-changer in the legal industry by showcasing the immense potential of artificial intelligence in enhancing efficiency and accuracy in complex tasks such as legal research, drafting, and analysis.

Despite its imperfections, it has reimagined how lawyers and legal professionals approach their work, opening new avenues for automation and data insights while highlighting the need for continuous human oversight and ethical considerations in AI usage.

Director of IT in IT Services9 months ago

Organisations need to understand theat they cannot be running with AI if they did not crawl and walk with AI. So jumping to GenAI is great but its like signing up for a Marathon when you did not even do a 5k run before. So my advice is start crawling and if required start with NLP and basic AI. GPT is a game changer but it needs to be used in a controlled manner and you need to build governence around its usage and understand the ethics standars and risks along the way.

Lead Enterprise Architect in Energy and Utilities8 months ago

From my point of view, Chat GPT is overrated, while LLM in general is a game changer. Chat GPT is "just" an application that cannot be used on an enterprise level due to the risk involved. Anyway, use an LLM model than GPT 3.5/4, Titan, etc. always in an "isolated" (at least proprietary) environment, it changes the rules of the game.

Content you might like

Who will WIN Generative AI Future (GPT/ChatGPT)?

Data & Analytics Disruptive & Emerging Technologies End-User Services & Collaboration+1 more

Open AI (Game Changer: adoption w/ChatGPT)41%

Google (Game Changer: inventor of Transformers, Bard)19%

Microsoft (Game Changer: real time BingGPT+Search plus enterprise enablement)19%

Meta (Game Changer: LLM that can run on single GPU)6%

Amazon (Game Changer: TBD)4%

X.AI / Elon Musk (Game Changer: TBD)3%

Baidu (Chinese tech giant, with GPT version released in March)2%

Someone completely new6%

View Results

46.7k views49 Upvotes15 Comments

If you have had a negative experience with a vendor (without naming the vendor), what did you learn from it?

Financial Management Vendor Management

VP of Global IT and Cybersecurity in Manufacturing6 years ago

Have clear business requirements up front, make sure the proposal includes items such as scope, timeline, cost, resources.

I have just been asked by an exec from another function to audit a critical project in their portfolio which does not appear to be going well. I have some ideas based on my own PMO experience, but wanted to explore how peers might think about approaching such an exercise. Considerations: - outside my main role - risk of conflict with the leader providing project management services to this exec - sensitivity within the other function to potential criticism of their governance - readiness of the project team to provide relevant information

Relationship Management Project Management Culture & Values+2 more

CFO3 days ago

I recommend that you consider finding an outside third party to perform the audit. I have had to do something similar with an unprofitable division/product line that reports directly to our CEO. We outsourced with Alvarez ...read more

130 views1 Comment

What is your primary deciding factor in adopting enterprise search?

Strategy & Architecture Cloud End-User Services & Collaboration+26 more

TCO19%

Pricing26%

Integrations21%

Alignment with Cloud Provider7%

Security10%

Alignment with Existing IT Skills4%

Product / Feature Set7%

Vendor Relationship / Reputation

Other (comment)

View Results

5.7k views3 Upvotes1 Comment

who are you using to purchase your Microsoft licenses from? We are a midsize enterprise (450 office licenses, plus a bunch of Dynamics spend) We are looking for a vendor that will provide support since we cannot budget for Microsoft direct support. We are also trying to determine if there are benefits to signing a EA over signing a 3 year agreement with someone like Telus who does not have access to EAs (like Softchoice)

6 views