In your internal audit reports, do you provide an overall conclusion (opinion)? If so, what is your process or methodology? And what are the categories that you use for e.g. overall high risk or unsatisfactory.

1.5k views6 Comments
Sort By:
Oldest
Information Security Manager in Insurance (except health)3 months ago
No. We rate individual findings on a low, medium to high-risk scale. We have a methodology to rank these.
1 Reply
Team Lead Quality Assurance in Energy and Utilities2 months ago

Thanks for your reply

Finance Manager in Telecommunication3 months ago
Yes, we provide an overall conclusion except few exceptions. Conclusions are made based on the materiality of the findings and overall control on the audited process. One or more significant findings may result in Unsatisfactory opinion. For opinion, there are three (3) categories i.e., Satisfactory, Needs Improvement and Unsatisfactory. It may vary from organization to organization.
1 Reply
lock icon

Please join or sign in to view more content.

By joining the Peer Community, you'll get:

  • Peer Discussions and Polls
  • One-Minute Insights
  • Connect with like-minded individuals
Team Lead Quality Assurance in Energy and Utilities2 months ago

Thanks for your reply!

Internal Auditor in Transportationa month ago
We rank individual findings and based on that conclude on the overall rating
Internal Audit Specialist in Energy and Utilities23 days ago
I've experienced three approaches: 1) the use of opinions, 2) the use of no opinions, 3) the use of private opinions.  The downside of opinions in reports  is the auditee spends time trying to change your opinion or changing the causes that contribute to the opinion (rather than discussing the issue at hand).  The political aspect is not to be ignored, too, when reporting opinions.  The upside is direct and efficient communication to the audit report recipients.  No opinions in an audit report can still be effective if you limit what findings go into the report.  Low level findings or risk impacts would be removed.  There is also a tactic to assign opinions to audits and not include the opinion in the audit report.  Rather the audits that reveal poor or unacceptable opinions are handled as one offs at the C-suite level.   I don't think one approach is better than the others, because not all businesses or cultures are the same. 

Content you might like

Bottoms up every month33%

Bottoms up for quarter, light touch on interim months67%

Quarterly forecasting only

View Results
1.6k views
Oracle ERP System Analyst / Accounting Manger in Retaila month ago
Are you asking as an audit firm justifying your billing to your client's audit chair? Or some other internal metric for worker utilization? Clarifying that might help you get more responses. 

Overall, I would look ...read more
1
617 views2 Upvotes1 Comment