How do you approach annual reviews with team members who perform well, but haven't done what it takes for a promotion?

759 views5 Comments
Sort By:
Oldest
VP Talent, Learning & Organisational Development in Manufacturing6 months ago
Honesty is key, everybody has potential to do something but you have to realistic and fair. If someone is a key performer but shows limited potential to go the next level up, you have to keep the person motivated and engaged. The person can still be critical to the organization for their deep expertise so we advice to leverage their expertise to maximize their contribution to the business. Continue to develop them and deepen their know how and make them SME’s for upcoming talent and a mentor, for instance. 
Director of HR6 months ago
Honestly.  Make sure you are able to describe why (even if it's difficult), and offer to support their development.  I don't think you should just give them development - people are responsible for their own careers - but helping someone who is taking that responsibility is the best way to keep them engaged.
Director of HR in Healthcare and Biotech6 months ago
I will "third" honesty and add that being very direct (not beating around the bush to soften the blow) is also critically important, to ensure the message is received. Continue to offer ideas for how the individual might develop, but also make sure they are owning their own development to drive their own career forward.
lock icon

Please join or sign in to view more content.

By joining the Peer Community, you'll get:

  • Peer Discussions and Polls
  • One-Minute Insights
  • Connect with like-minded individuals
Director of Talent Management6 months ago
I’ll add in my agreement of honesty being key here. Just because some performs well doesn’t automatically equal a promotion each year. Especially if we are talking about promotion from individual contributors to a people leader role.

If the employee still has development to get to the next level or promotion there should be a partnership in creating a development plan. Asking them what they feel are some key experiences or skills they need to gain before being ready? Then work on a plan to get those, and encourage the employee to be proactive in driving their development.
Global HR Transformation Leader in Educationa month ago
In this scenario, I focus on supporting their readiness for higher roles. This may involve providing shadowing opportunities, offering a tour of duty in another part of the organization or helping them build the necessary skills and experience within the next 6-18 months. I take a developmental approach and consider other pathways, such as lateral moves, if promotional opportunities are limited. It's important to assess the individual's current role expectations and explore ways to support their growth and advancement within the organization.

Content you might like

Yes, this allows Google to see competitor compensation package structures and improve their own.81%

No, offer letter reviews should be standard industry practice.18%

2.7k views2 Upvotes8 Comments
Sr Talent Acquisition Strategist in Healthcare and Biotech8 days ago
I think it depends on the industry. Here is one article that supports this point of view: https://www.rewardgateway.com/blog/employee-turnover-rates-by-industry

Read More Comments
182 views2 Comments

Fully onboard25%

Somewhat skeptical35%

Very skeptical14%

AI has no place in the hiring process25%

Not sure

View Results
973 views
VP Talent, Learning & Organisational Development in Manufacturing7 days ago
We are working on the next level of our global business strategy and I expect the leaders to indicate what type of profiles and skills they need. For me this is not an HR task only so I need our CIO for instance, to share ...read more
291 views1 Comment