Have you ever had to keep a legacy process in place to satisfy a specific stakeholder? How did you make it fit within the rest of your team’s workflow?

395 views1 Upvote2 Comments
Sort By:
Oldest
CIO2 months ago
Here's how I approached it:

Transparency and Communication: I communicated openly with the team. We framed all workflows, including the legacy process, as dynamic and adaptable. This set the expectation that things could change as needs evolved.
Phased Approach: I proposed a phased approach. We identified areas where automation could streamline the new processes without disrupting the legacy system. This minimized disruption for the stakeholder while showing the team the benefits of modernization.
Collaboration: I actively engaged the stakeholder in discussions about the future state. We explored ways to gradually integrate the legacy process into the new workflow as comfort levels increased. This fostered a sense of ownership and ensured a smooth transition.
lock icon

Please join or sign in to view more content.

By joining the Peer Community, you'll get:

  • Peer Discussions and Polls
  • One-Minute Insights
  • Connect with like-minded individuals
CFO in Finance (non-banking)2 months ago
Keeping a legacy process in place to satisfy a specific stakeholder is key
I only try to increase the rest of the team's reputation for further commitments to the goal therefore workflow was was still intact 
Reconfiguring the brain to think as productive as possible 

Content you might like

IT Manager in Constructiona month ago
Hello,
the topic is so broad, what are you focused on?
Read More Comments
4.8k views2 Upvotes5 Comments

Yes79%

No20%

1.2k views
243 views2 Upvotes
Senior Director, Defense Programs in Softwarea year ago
As a buzzword, it’s on life support.
2
Read More Comments
2.8k views2 Upvotes16 Comments