Enterprise Architecture question- how do you link a reference architecture back to the business need? We are currently building out a number of artefacts' to help with our Enterprise understanding of our organisation. As we start pieces of work with the business, we build out a business strategy, business capability model, tech catalogue amongst other things. How do you know which reference architectures you should be looking at, what is the trigger?  How would I know that I need an API reference arch or an Application Security, what information is telling me to build those out?

5.6k views5 Comments
Sort By:
Oldest
Enterprise Architect in Real Estate5 months ago
I tend to look at what you are asking across two lenses. 

1. Today companies need to be digitized, meaning they have to have an operational backbone that automates repetitive processes, supports seamless end-to-end transaction processing,  accesses single sources of truth for things like customers, suppliers and provides visibility into business transactions. 

2. Additionally companies more and more need to provide digital product offerings to their stakeholders (customers, suppliers) and these offerings demand highly integrated systems (and ecosystems) and processes to deliver the experience that is expected. 

To achieve both of these aims, there is a requirement for key technology resources and strategies to be employed that enable agility and innovation that is secure and adheres to the increasing regulation around data (privacy, right to be forgotten...). 

Given this backdrop, you are going to have cross-cutting technology needs (e.g. cloud, security, integration, data fabric) across all business capabilities that are foundational to enabling digitization and digital product offerings. This is what drives your need for various reference architectures. Your business will also have discrete needs for things like CRM and ERP which will drive application specific reference architectures.

So triggers for me are the cross-cutting foundations and the discrete applications making up the whole of the Enterprise Architecture.

1 2 Replies
IT Manager in Finance (non-banking)5 months ago

Many thanks for you reply, and that is a great way of viewing it.  Would you start with something that is "out of the box" which can guide us to make sure we have the right building blocks.  Or do you build out your own Ref Arch.  I am of the view that "you dont know what you dont know", so getting one out of the box helps us "check off" we have the right foundations for our enterprise.  Does that make sense?

Enterprise Architect in Real Estate5 months ago

Hi Duncan,

I am a very big proponent of leveraging as much "out-of-the-box" as you say I can get my hands on. So, depending on your industry, there usually are references that you can use to jumpstart your efforts. One of the more advanced examples is in Telecommunications where there is the TM Forum - How to manage Digital Transformation, Agile Business Operations & Connected Digital Ecosystems. This member forum has process maps, application maps, shared data models frameworks for APIs and vendors who have built capabilities against these standards you can quickly implement.

If you are in an industry that doesn't have a forum with similar assets, then you are going to have to assemble more of the pieces yourself vs getting them "out-of-the-box." You can get processes from the APQC: Industry-Specific Process Classification Frameworks | APQC and you can get quality reference architectures from Gartner Reference Architecture (gartner.com). You may even be able to find some industry reference architecture examples for your business that may have been shared by an SI or other entity that has developed an EA in your domain.

Then, because technology never stands still, you can leverage well established frameworks like https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework and IT4IT | www.opengroup.org to successfully manage change in a rapidly evolving technology world because at the essence the exercise you are going through needs to be evergreen and constantly updated for the times. These frameworks exist because of the repeatable technology patterns that are agnostic of industry but common capabilities your business needs to manage digitization and digital products as I 1st mentioned.

lock icon

Please join or sign in to view more content.

By joining the Peer Community, you'll get:

  • Peer Discussions and Polls
  • One-Minute Insights
  • Connect with like-minded individuals
Enterprise Architect in Finance (non-banking)5 months ago
Generally, the architecture itself and the architectural model that the organization or company pursues should focus on traceability of everything. For instance, if you have an application service for a business, that service will be linked to the business service, which is linked to the business.

If you mention 'business need', that could be interpreted as a requirement and requirement management aspect. That too is something that architectures should strive for, so that any architectural decision is tied to the requirements. That way, you can later on review why something was designed the way it is.
Information Security Manager4 months ago
I believe your question falls down to the "architecture continuum" category of TOGAF as "generalization for re-use" Enterprise Continuum (opengroup.org).  The reference architectures are being determined by the "changing building block(s)" of the architecture. For example, the trigger could be a project, a regulation, technology evolution or operational necessity. Then, let's say you need an API and authorization requirement/change, you need to have "API Reference Architecture" and "IAM Reference Architecture". Long story short, the business need or value can't be staticly assigned/mapped to reference architectures. I don't remember such architecture metamodel is existing.

Content you might like

Open AI (Game Changer: adoption w/ChatGPT)41%

Google (Game Changer: inventor of Transformers, Bard)19%

Microsoft (Game Changer: real time BingGPT+Search plus enterprise enablement)19%

Meta (Game Changer: LLM that can run on single GPU)6%

Amazon (Game Changer: TBD)4%

X.AI / Elon Musk (Game Changer: TBD)3%

Baidu (Chinese tech giant, with GPT version released in March)2%

Someone completely new6%

View Results
46.7k views49 Upvotes15 Comments
IT Enterprise Architect in Telecommunication4 days ago
Just side idea: as an intro to management and wide audience I was always using high level ppt slides to show
* current architecture landscape and 
* target scenario
Often there were some migration steps in between. ...read more
298 views1 Comment

Visionary30%

Communication skills59%

Empathy52%

Accountability38%

Decision-making skills39%

Adaptability20%

Integrity30%

Team-building17%

View Results
35.1k views8 Upvotes1 Comment
243 views2 Upvotes