Which of these still provide you value?

CIS 2027%

NIST CSF45%

ITIL27%

Please join or sign in to view more content.

749 PARTICIPANTS

6.2k views5 Comments

Sort By:

Oldest

Director in Finance (non-banking)5 years ago

Should be able to select multiple...

Director Certifications in Education5 years ago

This depends on the usage in the organization. I like CIS top 20 for testing against best practices configurations, NIST Cybersecurity Framework is a very broad but can use pieces for it in your environment, ITIL the same.

Director of Technology Strategy in Services (non-Government)3 years ago

I've found ITIL more valuable since I've blended it with eleemtba of TOGAF.

The inputs and outs of both are very similar and they should be done at a joint level.

Senior Director, Defense Programs in Software3 years ago

It’s always a blend (I tend to think most about NIST CSF), but always interested in the ITILv3 or 4 value chain discussion…

CTO in Software3 years ago

Agree with the multi-select comment. Also, this is really apples and oranges 🙂 which makes the context a bit confusing. One is a fairly specific set of controls, another is a broad framework for reducing cyber security risk, and the third is a set of best practices for managing a complete lifecycle of IT services. They are largely complementary.

Content you might like

What is your primary deciding factor in adopting enterprise search?

Strategy & Architecture Cloud End-User Services & Collaboration+26 more

TCO19%

Pricing26%

Integrations21%

Alignment with Cloud Provider7%

Security10%

Alignment with Existing IT Skills4%

Product / Feature Set7%

Vendor Relationship / Reputation

Other (comment)

View Results

5.7k views3 Upvotes1 Comment

If you have had a negative experience with a vendor (without naming the vendor), what did you learn from it?

Financial Management Vendor Management

VP of Global IT and Cybersecurity in Manufacturing6 years ago

Have clear business requirements up front, make sure the proposal includes items such as scope, timeline, cost, resources.

I have just been asked by an exec from another function to audit a critical project in their portfolio which does not appear to be going well. I have some ideas based on my own PMO experience, but wanted to explore how peers might think about approaching such an exercise. Considerations: - outside my main role - risk of conflict with the leader providing project management services to this exec - sensitivity within the other function to potential criticism of their governance - readiness of the project team to provide relevant information

Relationship Management Project Management Culture & Values+2 more

CFO3 days ago

I recommend that you consider finding an outside third party to perform the audit. I have had to do something similar with an unprofitable division/product line that reports directly to our CEO. We outsourced with Alvarez ...read more

130 views1 Comment

In the past 6 months, have you seen an uptick in targeted cyberattacks on telehealth devices and networks?

Security & GRC Network Threat & Vulnerability Management+2 more

No Increase16%

1-5% increase47%

6-25% increase24%

26-50% increase6%

51-75% increase1%

76%+1%

Other2%

View Results

1.7k views1 Upvote

Looking for others insight into how they are measuring capacity for their Robotics Process Automation Programs. We have almost 100 bots in production and a defined amount of developers. We are continuing to deploy new bots/new use cases as well as sustaining all existing bots in production. What have others done to define a "trip wire" for identifying when you hit max capacity?

Disruptive & Emerging Technologies

18 views