Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger says he wants his performance measured "on a two-, three-, four-year basis." What timeframe do you think makes the most sense for evaluating C-Suite executives?

Quarterly6%

Twice per year42%

Annually38%

Every 3 years7%

Every 5 years4%

Other (please share below)1%

lock icon

Please join or sign in to view more content.

222 PARTICIPANTS
2.5k views3 Comments
Sort By:
Oldest
Director of The Digital Workplace in Software3 years ago
Some lag metrics can only be measured on a long term basis, and moving out of a quarter-to-quarter mindset is good. 

However, there are definitely some influenceable lead metrics that people should be held accountable for to show they are moving in the right direction and meeting commitments. 

That should be the same for C-Suite, as well as everyone else.
1
Managing Partner, Partnerships & Strategy in Software3 years ago
It depends on the measure, doesn’t it?
1
VP Talent, Learning & Organisational Development in Manufacturinga year ago
Being a CEO is about being a role model. There are different ways of evaluating performance; you can measure financial and business performance only as part of a financial cycle/ share impact/NPS etc etc but on the 'how' a CEO should be much more regularly be evaluated, how is she/he interacting with people, what about communication style, what is she/he doing on turnover/retention/inclusion/ engagement. Those for me should be evaluated almost on a daily basis, that makes CEO's stand out from each other - not only when there is a formal performance to be reviewed but also how is this #1 leader acting on a daily basis, under stress or when things are progressing well. 

Content you might like

Yes79%

No20%

1.2k views
CFO3 days ago
I recommend that you consider finding an outside third party to perform the audit.  I have had to do something similar with an unprofitable division/product line that reports directly to our CEO. We outsourced with Alvarez ...read more
1
130 views1 Comment
VP of IT in Retail3 days ago
My previous organization implemented a strict one-strike policy for lost or damaged devices. While the first incident was considered an accident, repeat offenders were required to reimburse the company for the lost or damaged ...read more
82 views1 Comment

Yes85%

No14%

1.4k views1 Upvote2 Comments